>
网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
睑板腺癌组织EGFR表达及其与临床特征关系的研究
作者:巨根  郭丽萍 
单位:延安大学医学院 基础医学院, 陕西 延安 716000
关键词:睑板腺癌 表皮生长因子受体 肿瘤大小 淋巴结转移 预后 
分类号:R739.71
出版年·卷·期(页码):2025·44·第一期(98-104)
摘要:

目的:探讨睑板腺癌组织人表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的表达及其与肿瘤大小、淋巴结转移及预后的关系。方法:回顾性分析345例睑板腺癌患者的临床资料。通过免疫组织化学方法检测癌组织及癌旁正常组织中的EGFR表达水平。对EGFR阳性表达患者,根据EGFR表达水平(H-score评估)将患者分为低表达组、中等表达组和高表达组,分析其与肿瘤大小、淋巴结转移的关系。采用Kaplan-Meier法用于绘制生存分析曲线,采用Cox回归模型评估预后的独立影响。结果:345例睑板腺癌患者EGFR阳性表达占比55.07%(190/345)。癌组织EGFR的表达水平显著高于癌旁正常组织(P<0.05)。EGFR高表达组中大肿瘤(>3 cm)、有淋巴结转移、深部浸润和Ki-67增殖指数>20%的患者比例显著较中等表达组和低表达组比例高(P<0.05)。肿瘤大小>3 cm的EGFR表达显著高于肿瘤大小≤3 cm的表达(P<0.05);有淋巴结转移的EGFR表达显著高于无淋巴结转移的表达(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析结果表明,EGFR表达预测肿瘤大小(>3 cm)的AUC为0.795,预测淋巴转移的AUC为0.837,均显示出中等诊断效能。经Cox单因素回归分析和生存分析结果显示,EGFR、肿瘤大小、淋巴结转移、肿瘤分级、Ki-67增殖指数均与睑板腺癌患者预后相关(P<0.05);经Cox多因素回归分析显示,EGFR、肿瘤大小、淋巴结转移、肿瘤分级、Ki-67增殖指数均为影响睑板腺癌患者预后的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论:睑板腺癌组织EGFR高表达与肿瘤较大、淋巴结转移及侵袭性病理特征显著相关,且高表达组患者的生存预后较差。EGFR高表达可作为睑板腺癌患者肿瘤进展及预后评估的潜在生物标志物。

Objective: To explore the relationship between human epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) expression and tumor size, lymph node metastasis and prognosis in patients with meibomian gland carcinoma. Methods:The clinical data of 345 patients with meibomian gland carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. EGFR expression levels in cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues were detected by immunohistochemistry. A total of 190 patients with positive EGFR expression were included. According to the EGFR expression level, the patients were divided into a low expression group of 40 cases, a medium expression group of 85 cases, and a high expression group of 65 cases. Their relationship with tumor size and lymph node metastasis was analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw survival analysis curves, and the Cox regression model was used to evaluate the independent impact on prognosis. Results:Among the 345 patients with meibomian gland carcinoma, the proportion of EGFR positive expression accounted for 55.07%(190/345). The expression level of EGFR in cancer tissue was significantly higher than that in adjacent normal tissue(P<0.05). The proportion of large tumors(>3 cm), lymph node metastasis, deep invasion, and Ki-67 proliferation index >20% in the EGFR high expression group, were significantly higher than those in the medium expression and low expression groups(P<0.05). The expression of EGFR in tumors>3 cm was significantly higher than that in tumors ≤3 cm(P<0.05); the EGFR expression in tumors with lymph node metastasis was significantly higher than that in tumors without lymph node metastasis(P<0.05). ROC curve analysis results showed that the AUC value of EGFR expression in predicting tumor size(>3 cm) was 0.795, and the AUC value of EGFR expression in predicting lymphatic metastasis was 0.837, both showing moderate diagnostic performance. Cox single-factor regression analysis and survival analysis results showed that EGFR, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, tumor grade, and Ki-67 proliferation index were all related to the prognosis of patients with meibomian gland carcinoma(P<0.05). Cox multivariate regression analysis showed that EGFR, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, tumor grade, and Ki-67 proliferation index were all affecting the prognosis of patients with meibomian gland carcinoma(P<0.05). Conclusion: High EGFR expression in patients with meibomian gland carcinoma is significantly associated with larger tumor size, lymph node metastasis and aggressive pathological features, and patients in the high expression group have poorer survival prognosis. High expression of EGFR may be used as a potential biomarker for tumor progression and prognosis assessment in patients with meibomian gland carcinoma.

参考文献:

[1] 郭祈涵, 马建民.眼睑鳞状细胞癌的临床研究进展[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2022, 50(7):778-781.
[2] 曹雨婷, 郭中原, 刘晓谦, 等.表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂研究进展[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2023, 58(22):2016-2027.
[3] LEVANTINI E, MARONI G, DEL RE M, et al.EGFR signaling pathway as therapeutic target in human cancers[J]. Semin Cancer Biol, 2022, 85(1):253-275.
[4] HE J, HUANG Z, HAN L, et al.Mechanisms and management of 3rd-generation EGFR-TKI resistance in advanced non-small cell lung cancer(Review)[J]. Int J Oncol, 2021, 59(5):90.
[5] MAZIÈRES J, BRUGGER W, CAPPUZZO F, et al.Evaluation of EGFR protein expression by immunohistochemistry using H-score and the magnification rule:re-analysis of the SATURN study[J]. Lung Cancer, 2013, 82(2):231-237.
[6] 吴爽, 曹伟, 张涛, 等.睑板腺癌与基底细胞癌的CT和MRI表现与鉴别诊断[J]. CT理论与应用研究(中英文), 2022, 31(5):662-668.
[7] 娄琴, 罗显丽, 刘欢, 等.基于CT传统机器学习和深度神经网络预测肺腺癌表皮生长因子受体基因突变[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2023, 31(9):932-938.
[8] KANG X, LI R, LI X, et al.EGFR mutations and abnormal trafficking in cancers[J]. Mol Biol Rep, 2024, 51(1):924.
[9] HAILING T, YONGHONG P, YUFENG Z, et al.Challenges for the application of EGFR-targeting peptide GE11 in tumor diagnosis and treatment[J]. J Control Release, 2022, 349(1):592-605.
[10] 朱晓娟, 张虹, 张爽, 等.人表皮生长因子受体2低表达乳腺癌的临床病理学特征及预后[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2):243-253.
[11] NAPOLITANO S, MARTINI G, CIARDIELLO D, et al.Targeting the EGFR signalling pathway in metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2024, 9(7):664-676.
[12] 邹静敏, 王华东, 马长升, 等.多参数MRI预测直肠癌淋巴结转移的研究进展[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2024, 31(4):241-246.
[13] KASI P M, AFABLE M G, HERTING C, et al.Anti-EGFR antibodies in the management of advanced colorectal cancer[J]. Oncologist, 2023, 28(12):1034-1048.
[14] 赵涵, 徐倩, 杜金凤, 等.EGFR干扰联合埃索美拉唑对胃癌AGS细胞增殖、凋亡、侵袭和自噬的影响[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2022, 31(8):867-872, 880.
[15] LEHMANN U, STENZINGER A.Der biomarker EGFR in der tumorpathologie [The EGFR biomarker in tumor pathology] [J]. Pathologie(Heidelb), 2024, 45(5):344-346.
[16] WANG G, HE Y, SUN Y, et al.Prevalence, prognosis and predictive status of HER2 amplification in anti-EGFR-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2020, 22(6):813-822.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 494764 位访问者


copyright ©《东南大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481 83272483
电子邮件:
bjb@pub.seu.edu.cn

本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626

苏ICP备09058364