两种股骨隧道定位方法对前交叉韧带重建术后功能康复的影响-东南大学学报医学版

两种股骨隧道定位方法对前交叉韧带重建术后功能康复的影响

单位：东南大学附属中大医院骨科, 关节外科与运动医学中心, 江苏南京 210009

分类号：R686

出版年·卷·期（页码）：2022·41·第六期（806-811）

摘要：

目的: 探讨采用解剖足迹法和IDEAL定位法对前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后膝关节功能康复的影响。方法: 选取2019年1-12月在我院行ACL重建术的患者,手术前根据股骨隧道定位方法随机分为个体化解剖重建组(解剖组)和IDEAL重建组(IDEAL组)。记录术中移植物直径及并发症发生情况。术后定期随访,记录膝关节Lysholm评分、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)膝关节评估表评分、Lachman试验结果、再手术情况及满意度。结果: 所有患者均获得随访,随访时间25~30个月,平均(26±5.6)个月。术后3、12、24个月两组Lysholm评分、IKDC膝关节评估表评分均明显优于术前(P＜0.001),组间比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);末次随访时两组Lachman阳性率差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);随访过程中两组患者均无再断裂及再手术;两组患者手术满意度分别为96.2%、92.3%,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论: 解剖足迹法和IDEAL定位法ACL重建均能恢复患者膝关节功能及稳定性,两种股骨隧道定位方法对患者术后早期康复无明显影响。

Objective: To investigate the effect of anatomical footprint procedure and IDEAL positioning procedure on functional rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) reconstruction. Methods: Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction in Zhongda Hospital from January 2019 to December 2019 were selected and randomly assigned to individual anatomical reconstruction group(anatomical group) and IDEAL reconstruction group(IDEAL group) according to femoral tunnel placement at ACL reconstruction preoperatively. Graft diameter and complications were recorded during the operation. The patients were followed up at regular intervals postoperatively. Lysholms score, IKDC score, Lachman test, reoperation and satisfaction of patients were documented at the last follow-up. Results: All the patients were followed up for 25-30 months, with an average of (26±5.6) months. Postoperative Lysholm scores and IKDC scores of both groups at 3, 12 and 24 months were significantly higher than those before operation(P＜0.001). There was no significantly statistical difference between the two groups(P＞0.05). The results of the last follow-up showed that there was no statistical difference in the positive rate of Lachman test between the two groups(P＞0.05).No re-tear of ACL and re-operation were found in both groups. The satisfaction rate of the two groups was 96.2% and 92.3% with no statistical difference(P＞0.05). Conclusion: Both anatomical footprint procedure and IDEAL positioning procedure for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can improve the knee joint function and stability significantly. Two tunnel positioning procedures have no significant effect on postoperative rehabilitation.

参考文献：

[1] SANDERS T L,MARADIT-KREMERS H,BRYAN A J,et al.Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction:a 21-year population based study[J].Am J Sports Med,2016,44(6):1502-1507.
[2] MUSAHL V,ENGLER I D,NAZZAL E M,et al.Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part Ⅱ:evaluation,surgical technique,prevention,and rehabilitation[J].Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2022,30(1):34-51.
[3] PARKINSON B,ROBB C,THOMAS M,et al.Factors that predict failure in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J].Am J Sports Med,2017,45(7):1529-1536.
[4] MARKATOS K,KASETA M K,LALLOS S N,et al.The anatomy of the ACL and its importance in ACL reconstruction[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2013,23(7):747-752.
[5] VAN-ECK C F,WIDHALM H,MURAWSKI C,et al.Individualized anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J].Phys Sportsmed,2015,43(1):87-89.
[6] PEARLE A D,MCALLISTER D,HOWELL S M.Rationale for strategic graft placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:I.D.E.A.L.femoral tunnel position[J].Am J Orthop(Belle Mead NJ),2015,44(6):253-258.
[7] NAKAMURA T,KOGA H,OTABE K,et al.Comparison of three approaches for femoral tunnel during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:a case controlled study[J].J Orthop Sci,2019,24(1):147-152.
[8] HEFZY M S,GROOD E S,NOYES F R.Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments.Part Ⅱ:the anterior cruciate ligament[J].Am J Sports Med,1989,17(2):208-216.
[9] FERNANDES T L,MOREIRA H H,ANDRADE R,et al.Clinical outcome evaluation of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with tunnel positioning using gold standard techniques:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Orthop J Sports Med,2021,9(6):23259671211013327.
[10] TASHMAN S,ARAKI D.Effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on in vivo,dynamic knee function[J].Clin Sports Med,2013,32(1):47-59.
[11] MIGIELSKI R,ZDANOWICZ U,DRWIGA M,et al.Ribbon like appearance of the midsubstance fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament close to its femoral insertion site:a cadaveric study including 111 knees[J].Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2015,23(11):3143-3150.
[12] FINK C,SMIGIELSKI R,SIEBOLD R,et al.Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a ribbon-like graft with a C-shaped tibial bone tunnel[J].Arthrosc Tech,2020,9(2):e247-e262.
[13] FIGUEROA F,FIGUEROA D,ESPREGUEIRA-MENDES J.Hamstring autograft size importance in anterior cruciate ligament repair surgery[J].EFORT Open Rev,2018,3(3):93-97.
[14] PAGNANI M J,WARNER J J,O'BRIEN S J,et al.Anatomic considerations in harvesting the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and a technique of harvest[J].Am J Sports Med,1993,21:565-571.
[15] MAGNUSSEN R A,LAWRENCE J T,WEST R L,et al.Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft[J].Arthroscopy,2012,28(4):526-531.
[16] TUMAN J M,DIDUCH D R,RUBINO L J,et al.Predictors for hamstring graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J].Am J Sports Med,2007,35(11):1945-1949.
[17] SAMUELSSON K,ANDERSSON D,KARLSSON J.Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to graft type and surgical technique:an assessment of randomized controlled trials[J].Arthroscopy,2009,25(10):1139-1174.
[18] FUJIMAKI Y,THORHAUER E,SASAKI Y,et al.Quantitative in situ analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament:length,midsubstance cross-sectional area,and insertion site areas[J].Am J Sports Med,2016,44(1):118-125.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏】

提示：您还未登录，请登录！点此登录