>
网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
全病程管理模式对抑郁障碍治疗效果的影响研究
作者:王晓磊1  邢文龙1  田建华2  张桂青1 
单位:1. 石河子大学医学院第一附属医院 康复心理科, 新疆 石河子 832008;
2. 石河子绿洲医院, 新疆 石河子 832008
关键词:抑郁障碍 全病程管理 应对方式 
分类号:R749.4
出版年·卷·期(页码):2020·39·第五期(614-619)
摘要:

目的:观察全病程管理模式对抑郁障碍患者治疗效果的影响,从而为患者寻找更有效的管理模式。方法:收集2018年11月至2019年6月在石河子大学医学院第一附属医院康复心理科住院的抑郁障碍患者70例,按随机数字表法分为全病程管理组和对照组,每组35例。全病程管理组患者给予常规治疗的同时实施全病程管理治疗,对照组给予常规治疗。患者在入院后第2天、4周、8周、16周行24项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分,在4、8、16周行简易应对方式量表及HAMD减分率的评估。结果:两组患者HAMD评分时点效应存在显著差异(F=194.659,P<0.05),分组具有显著差异(F=28.530,P<0.05),时点与分组存在显著相互效应(F=45.710,P<0.05);两组患者在治疗4、8周积极应对与消极应对的比例差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗16周时比例差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),全病程管理组在4、8、16周减分率均为有效。结论:全病程管理模式在常规治疗基础上可以减轻抑郁障碍患者的抑郁症状,改善患者应对方式,巩固治疗效果。

Objective: To observe the effect of the full process disease management mode on the treatment effect of patients with depression and find a more effective management mode for them. Methods: A collection of 70 patients with depression who were hospitalized in the Department of Rehabilitation Psychology of the First Hospital of the Medical College of Shihezi University from November 2018 to June 2019 were divided into the full process disease management group and the control group according to the random number table method. Each group contained 35 cases. Patients in the full process disease management group were given conventional treatment while implementing full process disease management treatment. The control group was given routine treatment. The 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score was evaluated at 2 days, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after admission. The simple Coping Style Scale (SCSQ) score and HAMD score reduction rate were evaluated at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks. Results: There was a significant difference in the time-point effect of HAMD score between the two groups (F=194.659, P<0.05). The grouping had significant difference (F=28.530, P<0.05). There was a significant interaction between time-point and grouping (F=45.710, P<0.05).There were no statistical significances in the differences of proportion of positive coping style and negative coping style between the two groups at 4 weeks, 8 weeks(P>0.05), but the differences of proportion at 16 weeks was statistically significant (P<0.05). The score reduction rates in the full process disease management group were effective at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 16 weeks. Conclusion: The full process disease management mode on the basis of conventional treatment can alleviate the depressive symptoms of patients with depression, improve the coping style of patients and consolidate the therapeutic effect.

参考文献:

[1] FERRARI A J,SOMERVILLE A J,BAXTER A J,et al.Global variation in the prevalence and incidence of major depressive disorder:a systematic review of the epidemiological literature[J].Psychological Medicine,2013,43(3):471-481.
[2] FRIEDRICH M J.Depression is the leading cause of disability around the world[J].JAMA,2017,317(15):1517.
[3] GU L,XIE J,LONG J.Epidemiology of major depressive disorder in mainland China:a systematic review[J].PLoS One,2013,8(6):e65356.
[4] UHER R,PAYNE J L,PAVLOVA B,et al.Major depressive disorder in DSM-5:implications for clinical practice and research of changes from DSM-IV[J].Depression and Anxiety,2014,31(6):459-471.
[5] KIM J L,CHO J,PARK S,et al.Depression symptom and professional mental health service use[J].BMC Psychiatry,2015,15:261-273.
[6] DONG M,WANG S,LI Y,et al.Prevalence of suicidal behaviors in patients with major depressive disorder in China:a comprehensive meta-analysis[J].Journal of Affective Disorders,2018,225:32-39.
[7] MURRAY C J,LOPEZ A D.Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020:global burden of disease study[J].Lancet,1997,349(9064):1498-1504.
[8] LOPEZ J P,KOS A,TURECKI G.Major depression and its treatment:microRNAs as peripheral biomarkers of diagnosis and treatment response[J].Current Opinion in Psychiatry,2018,31(1):7-16.
[9] GRAHAM T.The concept of case management for long-term mental illness[J].International Review of Psychiatry,1991,3(1):125-132.
[10] 王虓,王振,江开达.全病程病案管理模式对首诊强迫症患者24周疗效随访研究[J].上海精神医学,2007(3):2-5.
[11] SINZIG J,SCHMIDT M H,PLUECK J.The representation of early onset depression by ICD-9 and ICD-10 categories[J].Psychopathology,2011,44(6):362-370.
[12] LEUCHT S,FENNEMA H,ENGEL R,et al.What does the HAMD mean?[J].Journal of Affective Disorders,2013,148(2-3):243-248.
[13] 姚树桥,高北陵,戴晓阳,等.心理社会因素在糖尿病发生过程中的作用及机理研究Ⅲ.社会支持、应对方式、个性对Ⅱ型糖尿病发生的影响[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1998,6(3):143-147.
[14] VILAGUT G,FORERO C G,BARBAGLIA G,et al.Screening for depression in the general population with the center for epidemiologic studies depression (CES-D):a systematic review with meta-analysis[J].PLoS One,2016,11(5):e155431.
[15] 瞿伟,谭永红,谷珊珊,等.全病程管理模式对抑郁症患者依从性及疗效的影响[J].第三军医大学学报,2014,36(11):1118-1120.
[16] 赵红梅,徐月勤,房金涛.米氮平结合认知行为疗法对抑郁症患者应对方式及认知功能的影响[J].贵州医药,2018(6):715-717.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 464661 位访问者


copyright ©《东南大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481 83272483
电子邮件:
bjb@pub.seu.edu.cn

本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626

苏ICP备09058364