网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
b-DNA法检测HPV mRNA在宫颈癌筛查中的系统评价:Meta分析
作者:吴方媛1  蔡云朗2 
单位:1. 东南大学 医学院, 江苏 南京 210009;
2. 东南大学附属中大医院 妇产科, 江苏 南京 210009
关键词:宫颈癌 筛查 b-DNA 第2代杂交捕获技术 Meta分析 

目的:通过Meta分析探讨b-DNA法检测HPV E6/E7 mRNA在宫颈癌筛查中的临床应用价值。方法:对PubMed、Web of Science、CNKI、万方医学网进行检索,时间区间为2011年1月至2017年12月,根据纳入和排除标准筛选论著,提取数据资料并进行质量评价,利用Metadisc软件绘制森林图、Revman 5.3软件绘制SROC曲线、STATA 12.0软件进行发表偏倚检测。结果:纳入10项研究,共2 810例。对照组为病理结果正常、良性以及CIN1人群,实验组为CIN2、CIN3以及宫颈癌患者。结果显示:所含人群中应用b-DNA和HC2诊断病理结果≥CIN2+的合并敏感度分别为82%(95%CI为80%~85%)和89%(95%CI为86%~91%),合并特异度分别为59%(95%CI为56%~61%)和41%(95%CI为38%~43%);加权SROC曲线下面积分别为0.850 4和0.770 1,差异无统计学意义(Z=1.908 1,P>0.05)。结论:b-DNA检测特异度较高,HC2检测则具有较高的敏感度,但两者对宫颈癌临床诊断的准确性无明显差异。

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of b-DNA detection of HPV E6/E7 mRNA in cervical cancer screening by Meta analysis. Methods: According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, using the databases, such as Pubmed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) and WanFang Data. After data extraction and quality evaluation, the software Meta disc 1.4 and Revman 5.3 were used to draw the forest plots and the Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic(SROC) curves. The AUCs of b-DNA and HC2 detection were detected by Z test, the Egger's regression test was applied to evaluate the publication bias by Stata 12.0. Results: A total of 10 studies with 2 810 cases were included. The control group included normal pathological findings, benign disease, and the CIN1 population. The experimental group included patients with CIN2, CIN3, and cervical cancer. Meta analysis showed that contained in the crowd, the pooled sensitivity of the diagnosis of pathological results ≥CIN2+ using the b-DNA detection and the HC2 detection were 82% (95%CI:80%-85%) and 89% (95%CI:86%-91%, respectively), the pooled specificity were 59% (95%CI:56%-61%) and 41% (95%CI:38%-43%); the area under the weighted SROC curve was 0.850 4 and 0.770 1, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (Z=1.908 1, P>0.05). Conclusion: The b-DNA detection has a higher specificity and the HC2 detection has a higher sensitivity. However, there is no statistically significant difference between the two Methods: in the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of cervical cancer patients.


[1] TSU V,JERÓNIMO J.Saving the world's women from cervical cancer[J].New Engl J Med,2016,374(26):2509-2511.
[2] CHEN W,ZHENG R,ZENG H,et al.Annual report on status of cancer in China,2011[J].Chin J Cancer Res,2015,27(1):2-12.
[3] CHEN W,ZHENG R,BAADE P D,et al.Cancer statistics in China,2015[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2016,66(2):115-132.
[4] WORKOWSKI K A,BOLAN G A.Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines,2015[J].MMWR Recomm Rep,2015,64(RR-03):1-137.
[5] WOODMAN C B,COLLINS S,WINTER H,et al.Natural history of cervical human papillomavirus infection in young women:a longitudinal cohort study[J].Lancet,2001,357(9271):1831-1836.
[6] ISAACSON WECHSLER E,WANG Q,ROBERTS I,et al.Reconstruction of human papillomavirus type 16-mediated early-stage neoplasia implicates E6/E7 deregulation and the loss of contact inhibition in neoplastic progression[J].J Virol,2012,86(11):6358-6364.
[7] VON KNEBEL DOEBERITZ M,RITTMVLLER C,AENGENEYNDT F,et al.Reversible repression of papillomavirus oncogene expression in cervical carcinoma cells:consequences for the phenotype and E6-P53 and E7-Prb interactions[J].J Virol,1994,68(5):2811-2821.
[8] HO C M,LEE B H,CHANG S F,et al.Type-specific human papillomavirus oncogene mRNA levels correlate with the severity of cervical neoplasia[J].Int J Cancer,2010,127(3):622-632.
[9] FONTECHA N,BASARAS M,HERNáEZ S,et al.Assessment of human papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogene expression as cervical disease biomarker[J].BMC Cancer,2016,16(1):852-858.
[10] DEEKS J J,BOSSUYT P M,GATSONIS C,et al.Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version[J].The Cochrane Collaboration,2013.http://srdta.cochrane.org.
[11] WHITING P F,RUTJES A W S,WESTWOOD M E,et al.QUADAS-2:a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies[J].Ann Intern Med,2011,155(8):529-536.
[12] SHEN Y,GONG J,HE Y,et al.Quantivirus® HPV E6/E7 RNA 3.0 assay (bDNA) is as sensitive,but less specific than Hybrid Capture 2 test[J].J Virol Methods,2013,187(2):288-293.
[13] 王华,陈亚宝,叶丽华,等.应用支链DNA技术检测人乳头瘤病毒E6/E7mRNA在宫颈疾病筛查中的价值[J/OL].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(15):4362-4366.
[14] 周星,刘丽华,张金库,等.宫颈脱落细胞HPV E6/E7 mRNA、HR-HPV DNA在宫颈病变筛查中的应用[J].山东医药,2014,54(6):54-56.
[15] 赵旭晔,崔勇,姜淑芳,等.高危型人乳头瘤病毒E6/E7 mRNA检测在宫颈癌筛查中的意义[J].中华医学杂志,2014(43):3432-3435.
[16] 李剑,曲芃芃.HPV E6/E7 mRNA与HPV DNA检测在宫颈癌早期筛查中的临床价值[J].天津医药,2016(4):466-469.
[17] 侯顺玉,戴建荣,周雪娟,等.HPV E6/E7 mRNA、HPV DNA和TCT检测在宫颈上皮内瘤变筛查中的应用[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,9(9):66-69,78.
[18] 李晓林,夏宝国,欧慧慧,等.高危型人乳头瘤病毒E6/E7 mRNA与其DNA检测在子宫颈病变中的对比研究[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2017,18(4):320-323.
[19] 吕涛,吴忧,廖秦平,等.高危型人乳头瘤病毒E6/E7 mRNA在宫颈细胞学ASCUS/LSIL/ASC-H分流中的意义[J].现代妇产科进展,2017,26(9):670-673.
[20] 朱远航,任琛琛,张小安,等.HPV E6/E7 mRNA检测对ASCUS患者临床分层处理价值评价[J].实用妇产科杂志,2017,33(8):595-598.
[21] REN C C,ZHU Y,YANG L,et al.Diagnostic performance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA assay for detection of cervical high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer among women with ASCUS papanicolaou smears[J].Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics,2018,297(2):425-432.
[22] 邬兰,张永,曾宪涛.QUADAS-2在诊断准确性研究的质量评价工具中的应用[J].湖北医药学院学报,2013,32(3):201-208.
[23] COOK D A,REED D A.Appraising the quality of medical education research methods:the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education[J].Acad Med,2015,90(8):1067-1076.
[24] OWNBY R L,CROCCO E,ACEVEDO A,et al.Depression and risk for Alzheimer disease:systematic review,meta-analysis,and metaregression analysis[J].Arch Gen Psychiatry,2006,63(5):530-538.
[25] ROSMAN A S,KORSTEN M A.Application of summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) analysis to diagnostic clinical testing[J].Adv Med Sci,2007,52:76-82.
[26] MILLS A M,DIRKS D C,POULTER M D,et al.HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization:validation against PCR,DNA in situ hybridization,and p16 immunohistochemistry in 102 samples of cervical,vulvar,anal,and head and neck neoplasia[J].Am J Surg Pathol,2017,41(5):607-615.
[27] DOORBAR J.Molecular biology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer[J].Clin Sci,2006,110(5):525-541.
[28] MEIJER C J,BERKHOF J,CASTLE P E,et al.Guidelines for human papillomavirus DNA test requirements for primary cervical cancer screening in women 30 years and older[J].Int J Cancer,2009,124:516-520.

您是第 261404 位访问者

copyright ©《东南大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
联系电话:025-87232481 83272483