Objective:To study the variation and clinical meaning of perfusion index(PI) in recovery of term infants with asphyxiation and shock. Methods:65 cases of term asphyxiating newborn in our hospital from October,2016 to December,2017 were selected,and according to the neonatal shock score, the patients were divided into the shock group(n=24 cases) and the non-shock group(n=41 cases), and all patients were treated with 2 h, 24 h and 48 h, and their PI values were measured.50 cases of normal full-term newborns in the same period were selected as the control group,the PI values were measured at birth, postnatal 2 h, 24 h and 48 h.Then,the PI values of each group were analyzed and compared, and their prognosis was recorded. Results:The PI value of the shock group was lower than that of the non-shock group at birth(P<0.05) and was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05). The PI value of the non-shock group was lower than that of the control group at birth(P<0.05).With the increase of the severity of the disease, the PI values of neonatal shock were decreased significantly.With the recovery of asphyxia and shock treatment and the other comprehensive treatment,the PI values of 2 h and 24 h were improved,but compared with the control group there was still statistical difference(P<0.05).To 48 h after birth,compared with the control group there were no statistical differences in the two groups' PI values(P>0.05). Conclusion:The PI value decreases significantly when the newborn is asphyxiated,and the decrease of the PI value is more obvious when there is shock.The repeated difficulty in correcting clinical factors such as PI suggests that we should pay attention to the presence of shock factors. |
[1] 母得志,李熙鸿.新生儿休克的诊治进展[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2007,22(14):1118-1120.
[2] 翁晓文,刘畅,孙俏丽,等.滨海县人民医院2008-2015年住院新生儿死亡原因分析[J].现代医学,2017,45(9):1295-1298.
[3] KNOBEL-DAIL R B,TANAKA D T,HOLDITCH-DAVIS D,et al.Perfusion index in very low birth weight premature infants during their first 2 weeks of life[J].Biological Research,2017,19(1):45-52.
[4] 黄杰,乾艾娜,甘斌,等.血氧灌注指数监测在新生儿休克中的临床应用[J].中国新生儿科杂志,2016,31(1):46-48.
[5] 中华医学会围产医学分会新生儿复苏学组.新生儿窒息诊断的专家共识[J].中华围产医学杂志,2016(1):3-6.
[6] 邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,邱小汕.实用新生儿学[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:568-573.
[7] 中国新生儿复苏项目专家组.中国新生儿复苏指南(2016年北京修订)[J].中国新生儿科杂志,2016,31(4):241-246.
[8] 虞人杰,王俊怡,刘淑芳,等.新生儿窒息多器官损害的临床诊断标准[J].中华围产医学杂志,2016,19(4):241-242.
[9] 新生儿窒息多器官损害临床诊断多中心研究协作组.新生儿窒息多器官损害发生率、高危因素和转归的多中心研究[J].中华围产医学杂志,2016(1):23-28.
[10] CLOHERTY J P,EICHENWALD E C,HANSEN A R,et al.Manual of neonatal care[M].7th ed.Philadelphia:Lippincott William & Wilkins,aWolters Kluwer business,2012:463-468.
[11] 吴本清,苏锦珍.新生儿休克的早期识别与治疗[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志,2017,32(2):88-90.
[12] 江学成.脉搏氧灌注指数和灌注变异指数的临床应用[J].中国危重病急救医学,2008,20(10):638-639.
[13] JIANG M J,CHU Z G,XIE Q H,et al.Application of laser speckle perfusion imaging in predicting wound healing time of burn patients[J].Chinese Journal of Burns,2016,32(12):721-724.
[14] KINOSHITA M,HAWKES C P,RYAN C.Perfusion Index in the very preterm infant[J].Acta Paediatrica,2013,102(9):E398-401.
[15] 黄梅,韦丹.围生期窒息新生儿血氧灌注指数监测的临床价值[J].微循环学杂志,2013,23(3):31-32.
[16] TAKEYAMA K,SUZUKI Y,YOSHIKAWA M,et al.Is the Perfusion index useful in early detection of high spinal subarachnoid block during cesarean section[J].Tokai J Exp Clin Med,2016,41(4):190-197.
[17] 胡春林.Masimo Radical-7脉搏血氧监测仪的临床应用进展[J].广西医学,2016,38(10):1427-1429. |