>
网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
一种新型三轴调节式精准穿刺定位器在椎间孔镜穿刺定位的临床应用
作者:史航1  吴小涛2  朱裕成1  马军1 
单位:1. 南京鼓楼医院集团宿迁市人民医院 骨科, 江苏 宿迁 223800;
2. 东南大学附属中大医院 骨科, 江苏 南京 210009
关键词:椎间孔镜 穿刺 透视 椎间盘突出 
分类号:R681.5
出版年·卷·期(页码):2019·38·第一期(125-130)
摘要:

目的:设计一种新型三轴调节式精准脊柱穿刺定位器,阐述其设计原理及方法,探索其辅助经皮椎间孔镜穿刺定位的临床应用价值。方法:研制一种新型三轴调节式脊柱穿刺定位器,辅助椎间孔镜穿刺定位。选取2016年1月-2017年6月接受椎间孔镜手术治疗的64例腰椎间盘突出症患者,随机将患者均分为两组,即新型三轴调节式精准脊柱穿刺定位器辅助组(辅助组)与采用传统C型臂X线机透视下完成穿刺定位的传统组(传统组)。比较两组患者术中透视次数、穿刺次数、穿刺时间以及术前、术后1 d、术后3个月、术后6个月VAS评分和手术并发症差异。结果:平均透视次数辅助组为(7.4±1.7)次,传统组为(18.4±3.8)次,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。平均穿刺次数辅助组为(1.4±0.4)次,传统组为(8.3±4.3)次,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。平均穿刺时间辅助组为(6.36±3.08)min,传统组为(24.54±6.72)min,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术前、术后1 d、术后3个月、术后6个月VAS评分,辅助组分别为(7.8±2.1)、(2.1±0.9)、(1.7±0.6)、(1.3±0.4)分,传统组分别为(7.9±1.9)、(2.3±1.0)、(1.8±0.4)、(1.5±0.3)分,两组患者术后VAS评分较术前均明显降低(P<0.05),术后两组患者同一时间点VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。传统组有1例患者术中穿刺过程中出现一过性下肢疼痛、麻木加剧,调整穿刺方向后症状缓解,术后无根性疼痛症状残留。有1例患者术后1月余复发,后行开放手术治疗。辅助组患者无相关并发症发生。两组患者并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:新型三轴调节式精准脊柱穿刺定位器辅助穿刺定位,可以明显提高穿刺准确率,减少穿刺次数及时间,并发症发生率低,有效改善患者症状,临床疗效确切。

Objective:To discuss the design principle and operation method of a new triaxial puncture locator, and to explore its clinical application value in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy(PELD). Methods:A new three-axis adjustable spinal puncture locator was developed to assist intervertebral foramen puncture positioning. Sixty-four patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation who received PELD were randomly divided into two groups, namely the auxiliary group of the new triaxial adjustable spine puncture locator and the traditional group who received the traditional C-arm fluoroscopic for puncture at the time of postoperative 1 day, postoperative 3 months, postoperative 6 months. The intraoperative fluoroscopy times, puncture times, puncture time and VAS score and postoperative complications after operation between the two groups were compared at the time of postoperative 1 day, postoperative 3 months, postoperative 6 months. Results:The average of fluoroscopy times were (7.4±1.7) and (18.4±3.8)respectively in the auxiliary group and the traditional group(P<0.05). The puncture times were(1.4±0.4)and(8.3±4.3)respectively in the auxiliary group and traditional group(P<0.05). The puncture time was (6.36±3.08)min and (24.54±6.72)min respectively in the auxiliary group and the traditional group(P<0.05). The preoperative and postoperative(1 day, 3 months, 6months) VAS scores were (7.8±2.1),(2.1±0.9),(1.7±0.6),(1.3±0.4)respectively in the auxiliary group. While the VAS scores were (7.9±1.9),(2.3±1.0),(1.8±0.4) and (1.5±0.3) respectively in the traditional group. Postoperative VAS scores of the two groups were lower than those of preoperative ones (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in terms of postoperative VAS scores between the two groups at the same time points(P>0.05).In the traditional group, one patient experienced transient lower limb pain and numbness aggravation during intraoperative puncture. After adjusting the direction of puncture, the symptoms were relieved. One patient experienced a recurrence after operation. No complications occurred in patients in the auxiliary group. The complications of the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion:The new triaxial puncture locator in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy can significantly improve the puncture accuracy, reduce the puncture times and time, reduce the incidence of complications, effectively improve the symptoms of patients and and the clinical effect is accurate.

参考文献:

[1] AHN Y.Percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis[J].Expert Rev Med Devices,2014,11(6):605-616.
[2] NELLENSTEIJN J,OSTELO R,BARTEL S,et al.Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations:a systematic review of the literature[J].Eur Spine J,2010,19(2):181-204.
[3] SAIRYO K,EGAWA H,MATSUURA T,et al.State of the art:Transforaminal approach for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy under local anesthesia[J].J Med Invest,2014,61(3.4):217-225.
[4] 温冰涛,张西峰,王岩,等.经皮内窥镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症的并发症及其处理[J].中华外科杂志,2011,49(12):1091-1095.
[5] AHN Y,KIM C H,LEE J H,et al.Radiation exposure to the surgeon during percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy:a prospective study[J].Spine,2013,38(7):617-625.
[6] 徐仲林,蒋赞利.经皮椎间孔镜技术的发展、治疗范围、并发症及特点[J].东南大学学报:医学版,2015,34(3):452-455.
[7] 格日勒,郭昭庆.经皮椎间孔镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的应用进展[J].中国微创外科杂志,2018,18(3):267-273.
[8] LEE K,LEE K M,PARK M S,et al.Measurements of surgeons' exposure to ionizing radiation dose during intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy[J].Spine,2012,37(14):1240-1244.
[9] 黎俊,瞿玉兴,赵洪,等.经皮椎间孔镜靶向穿刺技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的应用进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2015,23(21):1968-1970.
[10] 孙海涛,关家文,韩大鹏,等.CT引导经皮脊柱内窥镜治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2014,22(23):2133-2138.
[11] WEI H,TAO W,ZHU H W,et al.Three-dimensional intraoperative imaging with O-arm to establish a working trajectory in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy[J].Videosurgery Miniinv,2016,10(4):555-560.
[12] CHOI G,MODI H N,PRADA N,et al.Clinical results of XMR-assisted percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2013,8(1):14.
[13] 曾月东,苏建成,谢伟,等.椎间孔镜靶向穿刺新技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].实用骨科杂志,2016,22(3):201-204.
[14] CHOI K B,LEE C D,LEE S H.Pyogenic spondylodiscitis after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy[J].J Korean Neurosurg Soc,2010,48(5):455-460.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 413170 位访问者


copyright ©《东南大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481 83272483
电子邮件:
bjb@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058364