>
网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
自动化腹膜透析在住院终末期肾脏病患者中的适用性探讨
作者:徐焱  张苗  蒋春明  徐鹏飞  王娟  朱微 
单位:南京医科大学鼓楼临床医学院/南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院 肾内科, 江苏 南京 210008
关键词:自动化腹膜透析 间歇性腹膜透析 潮式腹膜透析 终末期肾脏病 住院患者 非计划透析 
分类号:R692.5
出版年·卷·期(页码):2018·37·第四期(716-720)
摘要:

目的:探讨自动化腹膜透析(automated peritoneal dialysis,APD)用于住院终末期肾脏病患者早期诱导治疗中的疗效和并发症。方法:回顾分析2016年1月至2017年7月53例在本院行院内非计划APD治疗终末期肾脏病患者的临床资料,根据APD治疗模式分为间歇性腹膜透析(intermittent peritoneal dialysis,IPD)和潮式腹膜透析(tidal peritoneal dialysis,TPD)两组进行分析。其中IPD患者30例,TPD患者23例。结果:53例患者共存在64个非计划透析的指征,依次为严重氮质血症、高钾血症、代谢性酸中毒和容量过负荷。经过72 h治疗,无论IPD还是TPD均使严重代谢紊乱得到显著缓解。治疗过程中无死亡病例,无严重并发症发生。透析相关并发症以机器报警和灌注/引流痛最为常见,分别为11例和10例。IPD治疗机器报警和灌注/引流痛发生率分别为33.3%和30.0%,显著高于TPD的4.35%和4.35%(均P<0.05)。患者治疗过程中有2例切口渗漏,1例导管障碍,1例鞘膜积液,两组间发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗过程中无疝气和腹膜炎发生。结论:APD可安全、有效应用于院内终末期肾脏病患者非计划透析治疗。TPD与IPD相比有较少的机器故障报警和灌注引流痛发生,更适合于住院患者的早期非计划诱导治疗。

Objective:To investigate the effectiveness and complications of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) for inpatient with end-stage renal disease. Methods:A total of 53 patients with end-stage renal disease initiated unplanned APD treatment in our center were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into 2 groups for comparison according to their APD modality as intermittent peritoneal dialysis group (IPD) and tidal peritoneal dialysis group (TPD). Results:There were 64 urgent dialysis indications for all 53 patients. Severe uremia was the most common reason for inpatient's unplanned dialysis, followed by hyperkalemia; metabolic acidosis and volume overload. After 72-hour APD treatment, both IPD and TPD were effective in improving the severe abnormal biomarkers and clinical signs and/or symptoms. No patient die during APD treatment. None of severe APD-related complications was observed. The alerts of the cycler and perfusion/drainage pains were the most common complications during treatment, and were seen in 11 and 10 patients respectively. IPD had significantly more alerts of the cycler and perfusion/drainage pains than did TPD (33.3% and 30.0% vs 4.35% and 4.35% respectively, both P<0.05). 2 incision leakage, 1 catheter dysfunction and 1 hydrocele testis were observed during APD treatment, and the occurrences of these complications were not significantly different in IPD and TPD patients(all P>0.05). Conclusion:APD can effectively and safely be used for unplanned peritoneal dialysis patients with end-stage renal disease who should start dialysis soon after catheterization. TPD was more favorable than IPD for fewer alerts and perfusion/drainage pains during the inpatient's early-stage APD treatment.

参考文献:

[1] YAO Q,DUDDINGTON M.Peritoneal dialysis in China[J].Perit Dial Int,2014,34(Suppl 2):S29-S30.
[2] CEREDA E.Mini nutritional assessment[J].Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care,2012,15(1):29-41.
[3] FARRINGTON K,COVIC A,NISTOR I,et al.Clinical Practice Guideline on management of older patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3b or higher (eGFR<45 mL/min/1.73 m2):a summary document from the European Renal Best Practice Group[J].Nephrol Dial Transplan,2017,32(1):9-16.
[4] HUGHES S A,MENDELSSOHN J G,TOBE S W,et al.Factors associated with suboptimal initiation of dialysis despite early nephrologist referral[J].Nephrol Dial Transplan,2013,28(2):392-397.
[5] MENDELSSOHN D C,CURTIS B,YEATES K,et al.Suboptimal initiation of dialysis with and without early referral to a nephrologist[J].Nephrol Dial Transplan,2011,26(9):2959-2965.
[6] MOIST L M,TRPESKI L,NA Y,et al.Increased hemodialysis catheter use in Canada and associated mortality risk:data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry 2001-2004[J].Clin J Am Soc Nephrol,2008,3(6):1726-1732.
[7] XU D,LIU T,DONG J.Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis complications:prevalence and risk factors[J].Am J Nephrol,2017,70(1):102-110.
[8] JIN H,FANG W,ZHU M,et al.Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in ESRD patients:complications and outcomes[J].PLoS One,2016,11(11):e0166181.
[9] LIU Y,ZHANG L,LIN A,et al.Impact of break-in period on the short-term outcomes of patients started on peritoneal dialysis[J].Perit Dial Int,2014,34(1):49-56.
[10] FIGUEIREDO A,GOH B L,JENKINS S,et al.Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal access[J].Perit Dial Int,2010,30(4):424-429.
[11] DOMBROS N,DRATWA M,FERIANI M,et al.European best practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis.3 peritoneal access[J].Nephrol Dial Transplant,2005,20(Suppl 9):ix8-ix12.
[12] PONCE D,BALBI A,CULLIS B.Acute PD:evidence,guidelines,and controversies[J].Semin Nephrol,2017,37(1):103-112.
[13] SEE E J,CHO Y,HAWLEY C M,et al.Early and late patient outcomes in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis[J].Perit Dial Int,2017,37(4):414-419.
[14] POVLSEN J V,SORENSEN A B,IVARSEN P.Unplanned start on peritoneal dialysis right after PD catheter implantation for older people with end-stage renal disease[J].Perit Dial Int,2015,35(6):622-624.
[15] JIANG C,XU L,CHEN Y,et al.A modified open surgery technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement decreases catheter malfunction[J].Perit Dial Int,2014,34(4):358-367.
[16] WANG C,FU X,YANG Y,et al.A comparison between intermittent peritoneal dialysis and automatic peritoneal dialysis on urgent peritoneal dialysis[J].Am J Nephrol,2017,45(6):540-548.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 414348 位访问者


copyright ©《东南大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481 83272483
电子邮件:
bjb@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058364