Objective: To compare analgesic effect of different doses of ropivacaine and its influence on hemodynamic stability for spinal-epidural anesthesia for advanced maternal age.Methods: Ninety cases of advanced maternal age undergoing cesarean section in our hospital were selected as research subjects, and were divided into low dose group and high dose group with 45 cases in each group according to random number table. The low and high dose group were given 0.5% ropivacaine for spinal-epidural anesthesia 2.0 ml and 2.5 ml, respectively, and the analgesic effect, anesthetic effect, hemodynamic indexes and adverse reactions of the two groups before and after medication were compared.Results: VAS score of high dose group was lower than that of low dose group(P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the score of onset time of anesthesia, anesthesia duration and anesthesia block effect between the two groups(P>0.05). Before medication, the blood oxygen saturation, the mean arterial pressure and heart rate of the two groups had no difference(P>0.05). 20 min after medication there was no change in the maternal blood oxygen saturation and mean arterial pressure of low dose group(P>0.05)and the heart rate rose(P<0.05), while the blood oxygen saturation and the mean arterial pressure of high dose group decreased(P>0.05)and the heart rate increased(P<0.05). Difference of blood oxygen saturation, the mean arterial pressure and heart rate of the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). The adverse reaction rate(4.4%) of the low dose group was lower than 22.2% of the high dose group, the difference being statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion: Low-dose ropivacaine for spinal-epidural anesthesia should be conducted for those of advanced maternal age in cesarean section. Although the analgesic effect is weaker than that of high dose, it has better hemodynamic stability with less adverse reactions, which is worth clinical application. |
[1] 纪淑敏.不同浓度罗哌卡因配伍舒芬太尼用于产妇分娩镇痛的临床效果观察[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2017,25(5):323-327.
[2] 赵怀金,郭兴彩.不同剂量罗哌卡因复合芬太尼硬膜外麻醉对产妇分娩中疼痛症状和母婴结局的影响[J].中国医药导刊,2015,17(9):924-925.
[3] 杨万福,魏青.小剂量舒芬太尼复合罗哌卡因在轻度妊高症产妇分娩镇痛中的应用与药理分析[J].安徽医药,2015,19(8):1608-1611.
[4] 杜媛媛,张莉亚.罗哌卡因配伍舒芬太尼用于硬膜外阻滞分娩镇痛对产妇和新生儿的影响[J].安徽医药,2015,19(6):1193-1194.
[5] 魏玉红.右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因硬膜外自控镇痛在足月妊娠产妇分娩中的应用分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2015,30(17):2852-2854.
[6] 张玉荣,赵二林,赵艳荣,等.不同比重罗哌卡因在剖宫产术腰麻中对产妇血流动力学的影响[J].贵州医药,2015,39(2):128-130.
[7] 于秀娟.罗哌卡因复合小剂量芬太尼行硬膜外阻滞无痛分娩对初产妇应对方式和泌乳功能的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2014,29(1):36-38.
[8] 刘春雷,康雅琴,朱红,等.舒芬太尼与罗哌卡因腰硬联合阻滞用于分娩镇痛及最适舒芬太尼用量的探讨[J].现代医学,2013,41(27):488-491.
[9] BRKOVIC B,ANDRIC M,CALASAN D,et al.Efficacy and safety of 1% ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after lower third molar surgery:a prospective,randomized,double-blinded clinical study[J].Clin Oral Investig,2017,21(3):779-785.
[10] HOFSTAD J K,WINTHER S B,RIAAN T,et al.Perioperative local infiltration anesthesia with ropivacaine has no effect on postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty[J].Acta Orthopaedica,2015,86(6):654-658.
[11] 王平,陈本祯.不同浓度罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼用于产妇分娩镇痛的临床研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2011,27(2):176-177.
[12] 耿志宇,吴新民,陆辉,等.产妇分娩时舒芬太尼或芬太尼混合罗哌卡因病人自控硬膜外镇痛的效应[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,1(8):677-680.
[13] 于海涛,张小艳,李克忠.右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因自控硬膜外镇痛在孕足月产妇分娩中的应用[J].山东医药,2014,54(11):44-46.
[14] 金胜威,徐旭仲,苏尔瞻,等.罗哌卡因腰麻复合硬膜外阻滞麻醉用于分娩镇痛对初产妇产程的影响[J].中华妇产科杂志,2002,2(3):50-51. |