>
网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
上颌后牙区种植修复后6~9年临床疗效观察
作者:朱艳香  程然  林梓桐  牟永斌 
单位:南京大学医学院附属口腔医院·南京市口腔医院 种植科, 江苏 南京 210008
关键词:种植修复术 上颌窦提升术 临床疗效 骨增量 
分类号:R783.6
出版年·卷·期(页码):2017·36·第五期(841-846)
摘要:

目的:评价上颌窦提升术应用于上颌后牙区垂直骨量不足的种植义齿功能负载6~9年的临床疗效。方法:收集2007~2010年上颌后牙区牙齿缺失行种植义齿修复患者69例,共植入种植体95枚,根据术前剩余牙槽骨高度(RBH)不同分为上颌窦提升术植骨组(A组)27例38枚,上颌窦提升术未植骨组(B组)17例24枚,常规种植组(C组)25例33枚,平均随访85.4个月,评估种植体存留率、种植体周围软组织状态、患者满意度、边缘骨吸收(MBL)、植入骨粉变化、上颌窦底位置变化等指标。结果:95枚种植体中有2枚在术后6个月脱落,存留率97.9%;三组患者对种植修复满意度评分为:(30.5±4.7)分、(29.27±5.34)分、(29.54±5.14)分,不同术式间满意度无差异;术后6~9年随访,种植体周围软组织状态良好,三组间无统计学差异;术后6个月,A、B、C三组种植体近远中边缘骨平均吸收为:(0.26±0.43) mm、(0.35±0.37) mm、(0.50±0.61) mm,结果有统计学差异;术后6~9年随访时,A、B、C三组种植体近远中边缘骨平均吸收为:(1.45±1.20) mm、(1.47±1.64) mm、(1.57±1.51) mm,结果有统计学意义,不同术式间边缘骨吸收无差异;术后A组上颌窦底位置上升,术后6个月为(1.42±2.23) mm,术后6~9年为(1.95±1.87) mm,且有统计学差异,其他两组差异无统计学意义。A组植入骨粉在术后6个月平均剩余64.23%,6~9年剩余6.56%。结论:对垂直骨量不足的上颌后牙区种植修复术后6-9年的远期临床疗效良好,上颌窦底位置上升率较高,所植骨粉大部分被吸收。

Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of dental implantation in patients who missed at least one maxillary posterior tooth with insufficient maxillary bone volume over a time period of 6-9 years. Methods:In this study, 69 patients suffered from maxillary posterior teeth loss were enrolled, with 95 dental implants inserted from 2007 to 2010. For group A, 27 patients were placed 38 implants via maxillary sinus floor lift with bone grafts technique. For group B, 17 patients were placed 24 implants via maxillary sinus floor lift without bone grafts technique. For group C, 25 patients were placed 33 implants positioned in native areas beneath the sinus. All patients were followed up for 72 to 108 months after surgery. The aspects of implant survival rate, peri-implant soft tissues status, patients' satisfaction degree, marginal bone loss, bone substitutes volume and maxillary sinus floor level were evaluated. Results:The total implant survival rate showed 97.9% with 2 implants failed in 6 months after surgery. There was no difference of patients' satisfaction degree among group A, group B and group C. Similarly, no difference of peri-implant soft tissues was found, which kept in good condition at 6~9 years after surgery. MBL was discovered with significant difference between 6 months and 6~9 years in the three groups and was not associated with types of surgery. Large parts of maxillary sinus floor were risen for group A. We found that the volume of graft materials remained 64.23% at 6 months and 6.56% at 6~9 years after surgery. Conclusion:The results suggest that implants in sinus-lifted maxillary bone achieve good clinical effect during the 6~9 years follow-up. The rate of rising maxillary sinus floor is increased after bone graft but bone substitutes are absorbed at a high proportion.

参考文献:

[1] SILVA L D,LIMA V N,FAVERANI L P,et al.Maxillary sinus lift surgery-with or without graft material? A systematic review[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2016,45(12):1570-1576.
[2] WHEELER S L,HOLMES R E,CHALHOUN C J.Six-year clinical and histologic study of sinus-lift grafts[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,1996,11(1):26-34.
[3] CHO-LEE G Y,CASTREJON C S,NAVAL-GIAS L,et al.A 12-year retrospective analytic study of the implant survival rate in 177 consecutive maxillary sinus augmentation procedure[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2010,25(5):1019-1027.
[4] BASSI A P,PIOTO R,FAVERANI L P,et al.Maxillary sinus lift without grafting,and simultaneous implant placement:a prospective clinical study with a 51-month follow-up[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2015,44(7):902-907.
[5] BERETTA M,POLI P P,GROSSI G B,et al.Long-term survival rate of implants placed in conjunction with 246 sinus floor elevation procedures:results of a 15-year retrospective study[J].J Dent,2015,43(1):78-86.
[6] BURTSCHER D,NORER B,DALLA T D,et al.A 7-year prospective radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around two different implant systems:a randomized clinical trial[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2015,26(11):1244-1249.
[7] ALBREKTSSON T,ZARB G,WORTHINGTON P,et al.The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants:a review and proposed[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,1986,1(1):11-25.
[8] LEE S Y,PIAO C M,KOAK J Y,et al.A 3-year prospective radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around different implant systems[J].J Oral Rehabil,2010,37(7):538-544.
[9] SBORDONE C,TOTI P,RAMAGLIA L,et al.A 5-year clinical and computerized tomographic implant follow-up in sinus-lifted maxillae and native bone[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2014,25(9):1056-1064.
[10] YILDIRIM M,SPIEKERMANN H,BIESTERFELD S,et al.Maxillary sinus augmentation using xenogenic bone substitute material Bio-Oss® in combination with venous blood[J].Clin Implant Dent Relat Res,2000,2000(11):217-229.
[11] ALTINTAS N Y,SENEL F C,KAYIPMAZ S,et al.Comparative radiologic analyses of newly formed bone after maxillary sinus augmentation with and without bone grafting[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2013,71(9):1520-1530.
[12] MISCH C E,PEREL M L,WANG H L,et al.Implant success,survival,and failure:the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference[J].Implant Dent,2008,17(1):5-15.
[13] CHACKO N L,ABRAHAM S,RAO H N,et al.A clinical and radiographic evaluation of periodontal regenerative potential of perioGlas(R):A synthetic,resorbable material in treating periodontal infrabony defects[J].J Int Oral Health,2014,6(3):20-26.
[14] CARMAGNOLA D,ABATI S,CELESTINO S,et al.Oral implants placed in bone defects treated with Bio-Osss,Ostims-Paste or PerioGlas:an experimental study in the rabbit tibiae[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2008,19(12):1246-1253.
[15] FROUM S,CHO S C,ROSENBERG E,et al.Histological comparison of healing extraction sockets implanted with bioactive glass or demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft:a pilot study[J].J Periodontol,2002,73(1):94-102.
[16] ARASAWA M,ODA Y,KOBAYASHI T,et al.Evaluation of bone volume changes after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone grafts[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2012,41(7):853-857.
[17] XAVIER S P,SANTORS T S,SEHN F P,et al.Maxillary sinus grafting with fresh frozen allograft versus bovine bone mineral:A tomographic and histological study[J].J Craniomaxillofac Surg,2016,44(6):708-714.
[18] SVERZUT A T,RODRIGUES D C,LAURIA A,et al.Clinical,radiographic,and histological analyses of calcium phosphate cement as filling material in maxillary sinus lift surgery[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2015,26(6):633-638.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 413357 位访问者


copyright ©《东南大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481 83272483
电子邮件:
bjb@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058364