>
网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
光耦合控制技术在上尿路结石体外冲击波碎石中的应用
作者:唐庆来  吕建林  贾春萍 
单位:南京医科大学附属江宁医院 泌尿外科, 江苏 南京 211100
关键词:光耦合控制技术 体外冲击波碎石 临床应用 
分类号:R692.4
出版年·卷·期(页码):2017·36·第一期(97-99)
摘要:

目的:探讨光耦合控制技术(OCC)在体外冲击波治疗上尿路结石的临床效果。方法:将407例行体外冲击波碎石(SWL)的上尿路结石患者作为研究对象,随机分为研究组(205例,采用OCC)和对照组(202例,采用盲法耦合技术)。应用多尼尔Compact DeltaⅡUIMS冲击波治疗仪进行碎石,比较两组结石排出率、碎石所需能量、冲击波次数及冶疗时间等,并进行统计分析。结果:研究组和对照组结石排出率分别为80.5%和63.9%(P<0.01),碎石所需的能量分别为(1.7±0.6)和(2.4±0.6)级,冲击波次数分别为(1900±403)和(2400±440)次,治疗时间分别为(21.5±5.3)和(27.6±7.3)min,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:应用OCC进行碎石能够更好地传递冲击波,减少能量的损耗,提高碎石效果。

Objective:To study of the efficacy of optical coupling control technique in shock wave lithotripsy(SWL).Methods:Four hundred and seven patients with urinary stones who underwent SWL were enrolled in this study,and the lithotripter,electromagnetic Dornier Compact DeltaⅡUIMS was used.All patients were randomized into two groups:the study group(OCC,n=205) and the control group("blind" coupling,n=205).The statistical analyses were performed by using a software package SPSS 22.0 to compare the SWL results between the two group.Results:The overall stone-free rates after 3 months in study and control groups were 80.5% and 63.9%,respectively(P<0.01).There were statistical differences in the results about energy level(1.7±0.6,2.4±0.6),numbers of shock wave(1 900±403,2 400±440) and treatment time[(21.5±5.3),(27.6±7.3)min]between the two groups(P<0.01).Conclusions:The lithotripter with OCC have excellent shock wave transmission properties with the least possible loss of energy,and it could improve the efficacy of SWL.

参考文献:

[1] JAIN A,SHAH TK.Effect of air bubbles in the coupling medium on efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy[J].Eur Urol,2007,51(6):1680-1687.
[2] BOHRIS C,ROOSEN A,DICKMANN M,et al.Monitoring the coupling of the lithotripter therapy head with skin during routine shock wave lithotripsy with a surveillance camera[J].J Urol,2012,187(1):157-163.
[3] PISHCHALNIKOV YA,NEUCKS JS,VONDERHAAR RJ,et al.Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy[J].J Urol,2006,176(6 Pt 1):2706-2710.
[4] McCLAIN PD,LANGE JN,ASSIMOS DG.Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy:a comprehensive review[J].Rev Urol,2013,15(2):49-60.
[5] NEUCKS JS,PISHCHALNIKOV YA,ZANCANARO AJ,et al.Improved acoustic coupling for shock wave lithotripsy[J].Urol Res,2008,36:61-66.
[6] LI G,WILLIAMS JC Jr,PISHCHALNIKOV YA,et al.Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance[J].BJU Int,2012,110(11 Pt C):E871-877.
[7] TAILLY GG,TAILLY-CUSSE MM.Optical coupling control:an important step toward better shock wave lithotripsy[J].J Endourol,2014,28(11):1368-1373.
[8] BOHRIS C,JENSEN H,BAYER T,et al.A new integrated ultrasound system for shockwave lithotripsy[J].J Endourol,2006,20(11):863-869.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 413503 位访问者


copyright ©《东南大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481 83272483
电子邮件:
bjb@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058364