超声引导下肢多神经联合阻滞在腘窝囊肿切除术中的应用-东南大学学报医学版

超声引导下肢多神经联合阻滞在腘窝囊肿切除术中的应用

单位：上海市浦东医院复旦大学附属浦东医院麻醉科, 上海 201399

分类号：R658.3;R614.4

出版年·卷·期（页码）：2016·35·第六期（874-877）

摘要：

目的：观察超声引导下闭孔神经、股神经、股外侧皮神经和坐骨神经联合阻滞在腘窝囊肿切除手术中的镇痛效果及安全性。方法：选择本院2014年1月至2016年2月期间行单侧腘窝囊肿切除手术的患者60例，通过随机数字表法随机分为两组：硬膜外麻醉组（epidural anesthesia，E组）30例和超声引导神经阻滞组（nerve blocking，N组）30例。于入室时、腘窝囊肿切除时、缝皮时分别监测患者平均动脉血压（mean arterial blood pressure，MAP）、心率（heart rate，HR），术中和术后2、4、6、10 h分别监测患者视觉模拟量表（visual analogue scale scores，VAS）评分，并监测两组术中血压下降及能够耐受止血带的病例数。结果：N组患者术中生命体征较E组更加平稳（P<0.05），N组能够耐受止血带的病例数明显多于E组（P<0.05），且N组术中没有患者发生低血压。术中及术后2 h两组患者VAS评分无明显差异（P>0.05），但术后4、6、10 h N组较E组明显降低（P<0.05）。结论：超声引导下多神经联合阻滞能够充分满足腘窝囊肿手术的麻醉要求，镇痛持续时间更长，更加安全有效。

Objective: To observe the analgesic effect and safety of the combination blocking of obturator nerve, femoral nerve, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and sciatic nerve under ultrasound guidance in popliteal cyst surgery. Methods: Selection was arranged in 60 patients having unilateral popliteal cyst surgery during the period from January 2014 to February 2016. They were randomly divided into two groups via the random number table: Group E with epidural anesthesia(30 cases) and Group N with ultrasound-guided nerve blocking(30 cases). Mean arterial pressure(MAP) and heart rate(HR) were monitored at the time spots of entrance into the operating room, popliteal cyst resection and skin suture. Visual analog scales(VAS) scores were monitored in surgery and 2, 4, 6, 10 hours after surgery. Meanwhile, The number of patients having hypotension with tolerance for tourniquet was recorded. Results: The vital signs of Group N was obviously less fluctuated versus Group E(P<0.05). The number of patients in Group N with tolerance of tourniquet was more than that in Group E(P<0.05), while no case of hypotension happened in Group N. There was no obvious difference for VAS scores in surgery and 2 hours after surgery between the two groups(P>0.05). However, VAS scores of Group N were obviously lower than Group E at the time spots of 4, 6, 10 hours after surgery(P<0.05). Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided multi-nerves combination blocking can fully meet the anesthesia requirements for popliteal cyst surgery with a longer duration of analgesia being safer and more effective.

参考文献：

[1] GANDHI K,LINDENMUTH D M,HADZIC A,et al.The effect of stimulating versus conventional perineural catheters on postoperative analgesia following ultrasound-guided femoral nerve localization[J].J Clin Anesth,2011,23(8):626-631.
[2] la GRANGE P,FOSTER P,PRETORIUS L,et al.Application of the Doppler ultrasound blood flow detector insupraclavicular brachial plexus block[J].Br J Anaesth,1978,50:965-967.
[3] MARHOFER P,CHAN V W.Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia:current concepts and future trends[J].Anesth Analg,2007,104(5):1265.
[4] 冯艳,张松,柏敬东,等.超声引导下锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞的临床效果[J].现代医学,2008,36(3):153-154.
[5] 张云慧,顾新宇,刘清仁,等.超声引导神经阻滞复合全身麻醉在胫骨骨折手术中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2015,31(3):228-230.
[6] 王尔华,方吉,朱炜,等.超声引导下股神经阻滞和腰麻用于髌骨手术的比较[J].东南大学学报:医学版,2010,29(5):563-565.
[7] MILLER R D.米勒麻醉学[M].邓小明,曾因明,译.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2011.
[8] 王璇,方芳,朱相干.芬太尼复合罗哌卡因腰硬联合麻醉在剖宫产手术中的临床应用[J].东南大学学报:医学版,2014,33(2):170-173.
[9] 陈云俊,夏艳,胡海青,等.神经刺激仪引导下外周神经阻滞与蛛网膜下腔阻滞用于下肢手术的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2013,29(8):749-751.
[10] 杜丽,唐育民.曲马多联合罗哌卡因行肋间神经阻滞用于肺癌患者术后镇痛的临床研究[J].东南大学学报:医学版,2015,34(2):235-239.
[11] HAYASHI H,UEYAMA H.Experience of ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block and femoral nerve perineural catheter placement in a morbidly obese patient undergoing total knee arthroplasty[J].Masui,2010,59(10):1260-1262.
[12] WEGENER J T,van OOIJ B,van DIJK C N,et al.Value of single-injection or continuous sciatic nerve block in addition to a continuous femoral nerve block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty:a prospective,randomized,controlled trial[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,2011,36(5):481-488.
[13] ABRAHAMS M S,AZIZ M F,FU R F,et al.Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block:a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Br J Anaesth,2009,102(3):408-417.
[14] JANKOWSKI C J,HEBL J R,STUART M J,et al.A comparison of psoas compartment block and spinal and general anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy[J].Anesth Analg,2003,97(4):1003-1009.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏】

提示：您还未登录，请登录！点此登录