>
网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
家长和老师对1~6岁儿童语言能力评价结果的可信度分析
作者:贾佳1  徐亚琴2  解雅春2  池霞2  张昕2  吴天琪1  王晶1  童梅玲2 
单位:1. 南京医科大学, 江苏 南京 210004;
2. 南京医科大学附属南京市妇幼保健院, 南京 江苏 210004
关键词:家长 老师 儿童 语言 Gesell发育诊断量表 
分类号:R179
出版年·卷·期(页码):2015·34·第六期(924-928)
摘要:

目的:分析家长和老师对1~6岁儿童语言能力评价结果的可信度,判断家长和老师对儿童语言评价的价值,旨在对早期发现语言发育落后儿童及时给予干预.方法:将家长和老师对215名儿童语言能力评价的结果分别同Gesell发育评估语言发育商DQ(儿童实际语言能力)作比较分析.结果: (1) 家长对不同年龄组、不同性别儿童语言能力评价结果与儿童实际语言能力之间差异有统计学意义(P1~3岁组=0.002,P4~6岁组=0.033,P男童=0.020,P女童=0.047),尤其是家长对儿童语言能力评价结果好、差等级和对男童的评价上差异显著;(2) 老师对不同年龄组、不同性别儿童语言能力评价结果与儿童实际语言能力之间差异无统计学意义(P1~3岁组=0.803,P4~6岁组=0.086,P男童=0.565,P女童=0.274);(3) 家长和老师分别对不同年龄组、不同性别儿童语言能力评价结果的可信度均小于0.5,但老师的可信度均分别高于家长.结论:家长和老师对儿童语言能力都有过高评价的现象,但老师的可信度要高于家长,应重视老师报告的儿童语言问题,同时需要提高家长对儿童语言能力的认知水平,结合专业的评估工具,早期发现存在语言障碍的儿童并给予早期干预.

Objective: To early detect children with developmental language retardation and let them be timely intervention by studying the credibility of language ability evaluation of children aged 1-6 years by their parents and teachers. Methods: We performed a comparative analysis of 215 children's language ability between the evaluation of their parents and teachers and the language development quotient by Gesell Developmental Scales DQ (children's actual language skills). Results: (1) there were significant differences between the language ability evaluation by their parents and children's actual language skills in different age groups and different gender(P1-3 aged group=0.002,P4-6 aged group=0.033,Pmale group=0.020,Pfemale group=0.047 ).In particular,there were significant differences about the parents of children's language ability evaluation results among the good level,bad level and the evaluation of the boy; (2) there were no significant differences between the language ability evaluation by their teachers and children's actual language skills in different age groups and different gender(P1-3 aged group=0.803,P4-6 aged=0.086,Pmale group=0.565,Pfemale group=0.274); (3) the credibility of children's language ability evaluated by their parents and teachers were both less than 0.5 in different age groups and different gender, but the credibility of teachers' evaluation was higher than that of parents. Conclusion: The parents and teachers on children's language ability all have a high evaluation of the phenomenon, but the credibility of teachers than parents. So we should pay attention to the teacher report of the chlidren's language problem. And we need to improve the parents' and teachers' cognitive level of children's language ability, and use the professional assessment tools, in order to early detect children with developmental language retardation and give them early intervention.

参考文献:

[1] VOIGT R G,MICHELLE M.Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics:Chapter 11 Speech and Language Development and Disorders[M].ELK Grove Village:American Academy of Padiatrics,2010:201-219.
[2] CAREY W B,CROCKER A C,COLEMAN W L,et al.Developmental behavioral pediatrics:chapter 72[M].London:Elsevier Medicine,2009:2337-2377.
[3] 王贞,李胜利.不同儿童语言障碍特点及主要相关因素[J].中国康复理论与实践,2013,19(6):536-540.
[4] 章依文.语言与言语障碍的发病机理、诊断与防治[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2011,19(10):48-50.
[5] WONG A M,LEUNG C,SIU E K,et al.Development of the language subtest in a developmental assessment scale to identify Chinese preschool children with special needs[J].Res Dev Disabil,2011,32(1):297-305.
[6] 顾培玉.正确认识儿童语言障碍[J].市场周刊:理论研究,2012(12):121-122.
[7] 章依文,金星明,马骏,等.儿童语言发育迟缓的早期干预研究[J].中华儿科杂志,2007,45(1):51-54.
[8] 刘兴莲,徐海青,戴琼.医教结合促进高危儿早期发展的临床效果研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2014,22(10):1114-1117.
[9] 王颖奕,唐洪丽,田野.南京地区儿童感觉统合失调与家庭及学校环境因素关系调查分析[J].现代医学,2011,39(3):272-275.
[10] 王晨虎,赵映敏,黄蕴,等.感觉统合失调的学龄儿童家庭环境因素调查分析[J].现代医学,2011,39(4):398-401.
[11] 章依文,金兴明,沈晓明,等.2~3岁儿童语言发育迟缓筛查标准的建立[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2003,11(5):308-310.
[12] 周翔,曾淑萍,李京,等.言语语言障碍儿童语言评估结果分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2008,16(3):240-245.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 412664 位访问者


copyright ©《东南大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481 83272483
电子邮件:
bjb@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058364