ROC曲线分析方法自应用于医学诊断试验评价以来得到较大推广和发展,根据曲线的形状和面积可对诊断试验作定量分析.基于不同的研究设计和资料性质,有不同的ROC分析方法.本文从ROC曲线的基本思想和分析方法,以及应临床及科研需要而衍生的新的统计方法LROC、FROC等方面作一回顾.

[1] Armitage P, COLTON T. Encyclopedia of biostatistics, 1998
[2] LUSTED L B. Logical analysis in roentgen diagnosis, 1960
[3] Hanley J A, MCNEIL B J. The meaning and use of the area under a ROC curve, 1982
[4] 陈平雁. 诊断试验的评价指标及其应用, 1991(5)
[5] Brismar J. Understanding receiver-operating-characteristic curves:a graphic approach, 1991
[6] Cantor S B, SUN C C, TORTOLERO LUNA G. A comparison of C/B ratios from studies using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. 1999(9). doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00075-X
[7] Metz C E. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. 1986(9). doi:10.1097/00004424-198609000-00009
[8] 李康. 评价判别模型诊断效果的ROC分析, 1996(3)
[9] BAMBER D. The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph. 1975(12). doi:10.1016/0022-2496(75)90001-2
[10] 顾海雁. 两分类独立诊断试验的评价, 1998(2)
[11] Campbell G. General methodology 1:advances in statistical methodology for the evaluation of diagnostic and laboratory tests. 1994(13). doi:10.1002/sim.4780130513
[12] Zhou X H. A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operating characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias. 1996(1). doi:10.2307/2533165
[13] EMIR B, WIEAND S, JUNG SH. Comparison of diagnostic markers with repeated measurements:a non-parametric ROC curve approach. 2000(4). doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000229)19:4&lt, 511::AID-SIM353&gt, 3.0.CO, 2-3
[14] Jensen K, MULLER H H, SCHAFER H. Regional confidence bands for ROC curves. 2000(4). doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000229)19:4&lt, 493::AID-SIM352&gt, 3.0.CO, 2-W
[15] Hanley J A, MCNEIL B J. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases, 1983
[16] Zhou X H. Comparing correlated areas under the ROC curves of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias. 1998(2). doi:10.2307/3109755
[17] DELONG E R, DELONG D M, CLARKE PEARSON D L. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves:a nonparametric approach. 1988(3). doi:10.2307/2531595
[18] TOSTESON A N, WEINSTEIN M C, WITTENBERG J. ROC curve regression analysis:the use of ordinal regression models for diagnostic test assessment, 1994(8)
[19] Smith P J, THOMPSON T J, ENGELGAU M M. 3.0.CO, 2-A.aspx">A generalized linear model for analysing receiver operating characteristic curves. 1996(3). doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960215)15:3&lt, 323::AID-SIM159&gt, 3.0.CO, 2-A
[20] Leisenring W, PEPE M S, LONGTON G. 3.0.CO, 2-M.aspx">A marginal regression modeling framework for evaluating medical diagnostic tests. 1997(11). doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970615)16:11&lt, 1263::AID-SIM550&gt, 3.0.CO, 2-M
[21] Pepe M S. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results. 1998(1). doi:10.2307/2534001
[22] CHAKRABORTY D P. Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic(FROC)data. 1989(4). doi:10.1118/1.596358
[23] Richard G S. Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images. 1996(10). doi:10.1118/1.597758
[24] CHAKRABORTY D P, WINTER L H. Free-response methodology:alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment, 1990(3)
[25] MOSES L E, SHAPIRO D, LITTENBERG B. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve:Data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. 1993(14). doi:10.1002/sim.4780121403
[26] Irwig L. Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy. 1995(1). doi:10.1016/0895-4356(94)00099-C
[27] Francois S. Evalution of medical technologies:a generalized ROC analysis. 1991(3). doi:10.1177/0272989X9101100312
[28] Joseph L, GYORKOS T W, COUPAL L. Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parametres of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard. 1995(3)
[29] Walter S D, IRWIG L, GLASZIOU P P. Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with imperfect reference standards. 1999(10). doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00086-4