>
网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
UF-100尿沉渣分析仪和显微镜检测尿液中管型的比较
作者:夏国华1 束国防2 朱启娟2 
单位:1.东南大学,临床医学院,江苏,南京,210009; 2.东南大学附属中大医院,检验科,江苏,南京,210009
关键词:尿分析 显微镜检查/方法 对比研究 
分类号:R4
出版年·卷·期(页码):2005·24·第一期(41-43)
摘要:

目的:探讨UF-100尿沉渣分析仪与显微镜检测管型的结果符合情况及影响因素.方法:随机收集住院患者的晨尿标本900份,用UF-100尿沉渣分析仪与显微镜分别检测尿液中管型,然后将两者的检测结果进行比较.结果:900份标本中UF-100尿沉渣分析仪检测阳性的有 129例,显微镜镜检阳性的有42例,两者检测结果不相符合的有97例,占10.8%,其中尿沉渣分析仪检测管型假阴性率为0.6%,假阳性率为10.2%.将UF-100尿沉渣分析仪与显微镜检测管型的阳性结果进行率的χ2检验,P<0.05.结论:UF-100尿沉渣分析仪与显微镜检测管型有显著性差异,对UF-100尿沉渣分析仪检测管型阳性者仍需用显微镜复检,并对管型进一步分类,以提高报告结果的准确性.

Objective  To understand the coincident conditions and inferencing factors about examining casts between sysmex UF100 automated urinalysis analyzer and microscope.Methods  Urine specimens of 900 inpatient were collected,every samples were firstly examined by sysmex UF100 automated urinalysis analyzer and Olympus microscope,then to compare the results between the two groups. Results  We analysed 900 samples, positive samples of sysmex UF100 automated urinalysis analyzer were 129 cases,positive samples of microscope were 42 cases. There were 97 samples for different results and percentage was 10.8%,there were 10.2% pseudo-positive samples and 0.6% pseudo-negative samples in 97 specimens. Conclusions  There is a remarkable difference for examining casts between sysmex UF100 automated urinalysis analyzer and microscope. Positive samples of sysmex UF100 automated uinalysis analyzer still need to be examined and categorized by microscope,in order to raise the accuracy of reporting results.

参考文献:

[1] DELANGHE J R, KOURI T T, HUBER A R. The role of automated urine particle flow cytometry in clinical practice. 2000(1-2). doi:10.1016/S0009-8981(0)00342-9
[2] 谭家成, 朱网娣. UF-100全自动尿沉渣分析仪与尿沉渣显微镜的对照研究. 中国实验诊断学2003(3). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2003.03.034
[3] MICHEL J. Automated flow cytometry compared with an automated,dipstick reader for urinalysis. 1999(1)
[4] 熊立凡. 临床检验基础, 2003
[5] 叶应妩. 全国临床检验操作规程, 1997
[6] 丛玉隆, 马骏龙. 当代尿液分析技术与临床, 1998
[7] 丛玉隆, 王淑娟. 今日临床检验学, 1997
[8] 李微, 黄旭东. UF-100尿沉渣分析仪检测病理性管型的探讨. 汕头大学医学院学报2001(1). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-4716.2001.01.020
[9] 顾可梁. 尿沉渣镜检. 上海医学2000(2). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2000.02.003
[10] 丛玉隆, 马骏龙. 尿液常规分析质量控制及临床应用研究体会. 临床医学检验杂志2001(1). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-764X.2001.04.035 

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 414729 位访问者


copyright ©《东南大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481 83272483
电子邮件:
bjb@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058364