>
网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
磁共振血管造影与数字减影血管造影在脑血管狭窄闭塞性疾病诊断中的比较研究
作者:SIMANT Mehta  邓刚 
单位:东南大学附属中大医院放射科, 江苏 南京 210009
关键词:磁共振血管造影 数字减影血管造影 最大密度投影重建 北美有症状颈动脉内膜切除试验标准 闭塞 狭窄 
分类号:R445;R743
出版年·卷·期(页码):2013·32·第六期(655-662)
摘要:

目的:对比研究磁共振血管造影(MRA)(1.5、3.0 T)与数字减影血管造影(DSA)对于脑血管狭窄闭塞性疾病诊断及量化的作用。方法:回顾性研究110例临床怀疑患有脑血管病变的受试病人,其中55例行1.5 T MRA扫描(3D TOF序列),另55例行3.0 T MRA(3D TOF序列)扫描。在最大密度投影重建像及常规DSA图像下测定脑血管狭窄程度,以北美有症状颈动脉内膜切除试验标准为参考。结果:对于脑血管狭窄的分级,1.5 T、3.0 T MRA与DSA结果一致率分别为86.5%、90.5%。在诊断明确后,1.5 T MRA敏感度及特异度分别为90%、98%;阳性预测值(PPV)及阴性预测值(NPV)分别为87%、99%;总准确率为94%。同时,3.0 T MRA敏感度及特异度分别为92%、99%,PPV及NPV分别为91%、99%,准确率为96%。对于脑血管狭窄闭塞疾病的测定,DSA与1.5 T MRA(P=0.31,P>0.05)、3.0 T MRA(P=0.30,P>0.05)差异均无统计学意义,1.5 T MRA与3.0 T MRA之间差异亦无统计学意义(P=0.70,P>0.05)。结论:本实验结果表明,对于脑血管狭窄闭塞性疾病的诊断MRA的3 D TOF序列能够作为DSA之外的一种可靠的诊断方法,且3.0 T MRA稍优于1.5 T MRA。

Objective: To evaluate the ability of 1.5 T MRA and 3.0 T MRA separately to help detect and quantify cerebrovascular stenoses and occlusion compared with digital subtraction angiography(DSA). Methods: This retrospective study enrolled total of 110 patients suspected for cerebrovascular lesions. Fifty-five patients underwent 3 D time-of-flight(TOF) MRA at 1.5 T and the remaining 55 patients underwent 3 D TOF MRA at 3.0 T MRA. The guidelines of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial for measuring stenosis were applied on maximum intensity projections images and conventional digital subtraction angiography. Results: Grading of stenoses on 3 D TOF MRA agreed with grading of stenoses on DSA images in 86.5% of arteries on 1.5 T MRA and 90.5% of arteries on 3.0 T MRA. After consensus interpretation 1.5 T MRA had sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 98%. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 87% and 99% respectively. Overall accuracy was 94%.Similarly,3.0 T MRA had a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 99%, PPV of 91% and NPV of 99%. Overall accuracy was 96%. There was no significant difference found in the measurement of stenosis and occlusion between DSA and 1.5 T MRA(P=0.31), DSA and 3.0 T MRA(P=0.30). Similarly, no significant difference was found between 1.5 T MRA and 3.0 T MRA (P=0.70). Conclusion: This study provides additional evidence that 3 D TOF MRA could become a diagnostic alternative to DSA in the management of patients with cerebrovascular. 3.0 T MRA shows slightly better results than 1.5 T MRA.

参考文献:

[1] GUPTA R,JOSHI P,MOHAN V,et al.Epidemiology and causation of coronary heart disease and stroke in India[J].Heart,2008,94(1):16-26.
[2] WONG L K.Global burden of intracranial atherosclerosis[J].Int Stroke,2006,(1):158-159.
[3] YANG C W,CARR J C,FUTTERER S F,et al.Contrast enhanced MR Angiography of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations[J].AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2005,26(8):2095-2101.
[4] JANSENS E,LECLERC X,GAUTIER C,et al.Percutaneous translumial angioplasty of proximal vertebral artery stenosis:long-term clinical follow-up of 16 consecutive patients[J].Neuroradiology,2003,46:81-84.
[5] GUPTA R,SCHUMACHER H,MANGLA S,et al.Urgent endovascular revascularization for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis[J].Neuroradiology,2003,61(12):1647-1648.
[6] ALBUQUERQUE F,FIORELLA D,HAN P,et al.A reappraisal of angioplasty and stenting and stenting for the treatment of vertebral origin stenosis[J].Neurosurgery,2003,53(9):607-614.
[7] WILLINSKY R,TAYLOR S,TERBRUGGE K,et al.Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2 899 procedures and review of literature[J].Radiology,2003,227(5):522-528.
[8] KOELEMAY M,LIJMER J,STOKER J,et al.Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis[J].JAMA,2001,(11):32-43.
[9] WAUGH J R,SCHARIAS N.Aretiographic complications in the DSA[J].Radiology,2002,182(9):243-246.
[10] GRIST T M.MRA of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities[J].Magn Reson Imaging,2000,11(1):32-43.
[11] WUTKE R,LANG W,FELLNER C,et al.High resolution,contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with elliptical centric k-spaceordering of supraortic arteries compared with selective X-ray angiography[J].Stroke,2002,33(6):1522-1529.
[12] BASH S,VILLABLANCA J P,JAHAN R,et al.Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease:evaluation with CT angiography,MR angiography,MR angiography,and digital subtracyion angiography[J].AJNR Am Neuroradiol,2005,26(5):1012-1021.
[13] MALLOUHI A F S,CHAMELLI A,DESSL A,et al.Detection and characterization of aneurysms with MR angiography[J].AJR Am J Roengenol,2003,180(1):55-64.
[14] HUANG J,DEGNAN A J,LIU Q,et al.Comparision of NASCET and WASID criteria for the measurement of intracranial stenosis using DSA and CTA of the MCA[J].Neuroradiol,2012,39(5):342-345.
[15] BASH S,VILLABLANCA J P,JAHAN R,et al.Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease:evaluation with CTA,MRA,and DSA[J].AJNR Am J Neuroradiology,2005,26(5):1012-1021.
[15] COCHRAN S T.Anaphylactoid reactions to radiocontrast media[J].Curr Allergy Asthma Rep,2005,5(1):28-31.
[16] PAUL J,GRAFF Y,EIKELBOOM B C,et al.Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis:does a flow void represent severe stenosis?[J].AJNR,2002,23(10):1779-1784.
[17] FELDMANN E,WILTERDINK J L,KOSINISKY A,et al.The stroke outcomes and neuroimaging of intracranial atherosclerosis(SONIA) trial[J].Neurology,2007,68(24):2099-2106.
[18] CHOI C G,LEE D H,LEE J H,et al.Detection of intracranial atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease with 3 D TOF MRA with sensitivity encoding at 3 T[J].AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2007,28(3):439-446.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 405682 位访问者


copyright ©《东南大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481 83272483
电子邮件:
bjb@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058364