>
网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
两种球囊导管在三维子宫输卵管超声造影中的应用研究
作者:李宏波  张玫玫  强也  马云飞  毛书霞  高慧  蔡婷 
单位:南京中医药大学附属医院 超声医学科, 江苏 南京 210029
关键词:三维子宫输卵管超声造影 球囊导管 不孕症 
分类号:R711.6;R445.1
出版年·卷·期(页码):2019·38·第三期(494-497)
摘要:

目的:评估和比较两种不同球囊导管在阴道三维子宫输卵管超声造影(3D HyCoSy)中的应用。方法:将186名不孕患者随机分为子宫通液管组和Foley's双腔管组,患者先阴道超声检查评估子宫和卵巢,再宫腔置管后行3D HyCoSy检查,比较两组患者宫腔置管成功率、不良反应以及视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评分结果。结果:两组患者均完成3D HyCoSy检查,两组患者年龄、输卵管通畅度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。置管成功率Foley's双腔管组为100%(92/92),高于子宫通液管组的95.74%(90/94)(P<0.05)。两组患者的疼痛VAS评分中,Foley's双腔管组的中、重度疼痛患者明显少于子宫通液管组(P<0.05)。结论:与子宫通液管相较,应用Foley's双腔管行3D HyCoSy宫腔置管成功率高,患者检查耐受性好。

Objective:To evaluate and compare the application value of two different balloon catheters in transvaginal real-time three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography(3D HyCoSy). Methods:One hundred and eighty-six infertile patients were randomly divided into two groups,i.e., uterine fluid tube group and Foley's double-lumen tube group. The patients underwent transvaginal ultrasound examination first to assess the status of uterus and ovaries, and then the 3D HyCoSy was conducted after uterine catheterization. Success rate, adverse reactions and results of pain VAS score were compared between the two groups. Results:3D HyCoSy was performed successfully in the two groups. There was no significant difference in age and fallopian tube patency between the two groups. The success rate of catheter insertion was 100%(92/92) in Foley's double-lumen group, which was higher than that of uterine tube group 95.74%(90/94). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). In Foley's double-lumen group, patients of severe pain were fewer than those in the uterine tube group. Conclusion:Compared with the uterine tube group, the Foley's dual-lumen tube has a high success rate of 3D HyCoSy uterine catheterization, and patients have better pain tolerance.

参考文献:

[1] 韩巧芳,谢玉环,罗海波,等.经阴道子宫输卵管四维超声造影评价输卵管通畅性的研究[J].生殖医学杂志,2014,23(10):788-792.
[2] 李宏波,殷立平,张玫玫,等.实时三维子宫输卵管超声造影耐受性和安全性评估[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2016(3):310-313.
[3] SAVELLI L,POLLASTRI P,GUERRINI M,et al.Tolerability,side effects,and complications of hysterosalpingocontrast sonography(HyCoSy)[J].Fertil Steril,2009,92(4):1481-1486.
[4] PATRICIA S,BEN M,VEEN D,et al.The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology:a meta-analysis[J].Fertil Steril,1995,64(3):486-491.
[5] TARIK A,FEHMI C.Complications of gynaecological laparoscopy——a retrospective analysis of 3572 cases from a single institute[J].J Obstet Gynaecol,2004,24(7):813-816.
[6] STRANDELL A,BOURNE T,BERGH C,et al.A simplified ultrasound based infertility investigation protocol and its implications for patient management[J].J Assist Reprod Genet,2000,17(2):87-92.
[7] LIM C P,HASAFA Z,BHATTACHARYA S,et al.Should a hysterosalpingogram be a first-line investigation to diagnose female tubal subfertility in the modern subfertility workup[J].Hum Reprod,2011,26(5):967-971.
[8] HE Y,GENG Q,LIU H,et al.First experience using 4-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with SonoVue for assessing fallopian tube patency[J].J Ultrasound Med,2013,32(7):1233-1243.
[9] EXACOUSTOS C,PIZZO A,LAZZERI L,et al.3D Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography with gel foam:methodology and feasibility to obtain 3D volumes of tubal shape[J].J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2017,24(5):827-832.
[10] CALLES-SASTRE L,ENGELS-CALVO V,MAR RÍOS-VALLEJO P H D,et al.Prospective study of concordance between hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography and hysteroscopy for evaluation of the uterine cavity in patients undergoing infertility studies[J].J Ultrasound Med,2018,37:1431-1437.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 405525 位访问者


copyright ©《东南大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481 83272483
电子邮件:
bjb@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058364