>
网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
多中心多学科治疗模式下对局部晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的新辅助化疗疗效及预后影响的临床研究
作者:李晓雷1  徐俊1  胡欣2  汪华1 
单位:1. 南充市中心医院 胸心外科, 四川 南充 637000;
2. 南充市中心医院 肿瘤科, 四川 南充 637000
关键词:多中心多学科治疗 非小细胞肺癌 临床有效率 预后 
分类号:R734.2
出版年·卷·期(页码):2018·37·第四期(667-672)
摘要:

目的:探讨多中心多学科治疗(MDT)模式下对局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的新辅助化疗疗效及预后影响。方法:选择本院2013年3月至2015年7月收治的110例局部晚期NSCLC患者,将其随机分为研究组与对照组,各55例。对照组采用单中心标准模式治疗,研究组采用多中心MDT模式治疗。比较两组患者的临床有效率、相关临床及预后指标的变化。结果:与对照组相比,研究组新辅助化疗后纵隔淋巴结缩小更加明显(P<0.05)。2周期新辅助化疗后,研究组的临床有效率(69.1%)显著高于对照组(41.8%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组平均住院费用及平均住院时间均少于对照组,术后VAS疼痛评分也显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。尽管在1年生存率方面,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但研究组生存率(65.5%)仍高于对照组(50.9%),同时研究组PFS明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组血清预后相关指标比较均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组血清预后相关指标浓度均降低,且研究组显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后研究组肺癌患者生存质量量表(FACT-L)评分显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:在对中晚期NSCLC患者进行治疗时,多中心MDT模式较单中心标准模式在一定程度上可提高患者的临床疗效及生活质量,同时可改善预后,值得临床推广应用。

Objective:To explore the clinical study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy and prognosis in the application of multicenter multidisciplinary treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.Methods:The patients with NSCLC were randomly collected and divided into the study group (n=55) and the control group (n=55) from March 2013 to July 2015 in our hospital. The single center standard treatment model was used in the control group, and multicenter MDT model was applied in the study group. The clinical efficiency, clinical and prognosis correlation indexes were compared between the two groups using statistical analysis. Results:Compared to the control, the size of mediastinal lymph nodes decreased more significantly after chemical treatment in the study group(P<0.05). After two weeks treatment,the effective rate in the study group(69.1%)was significantly higher than that in the control group(41.8%)(P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the average hospital cost, the length of stay, the VAS scores were lower in the study group(P<0.05). Although there was no significant difference for the 1-year survival rate between the two groups (P>0.05), the survival rate of the study group (65.5%) was higher than that of the control group (50.9%),while PFS in the study was more than that of the control group (P<0.05). Additionally, there was no significant difference in serum prognosis between the two groups before treatment. However, after treatment,the serum prognostic markers of the two groups decreased,and the levels in the study group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). The FACT-L scores in the study group were also higher than that of the control group after treatment(P<0.05). Conclusion:The multicenter multidisciplinary team model is an effective measure for locally advanced NSCLC patients, which helps patients to improve the effective rate,the quality of life and the prognosis. Therefore, this model should be widely applied in clinical treatment.

参考文献:

[1] BEHERA M,OWONIKOKO T K,CHEN Z,et al.Single-agent maintenance therapy for advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer:a meta-analysis[J].Lung Cancer,2012,77(2):331-338.
[2] ANDEY T,MAREPALLY S,PATEL A,et al.Cationic lipid guided short-hairpin RNA interference of annexin A2 attenuates tumor growth and metastasis in a mouse lung cancer stem cell model[J].J Control Release,2014,184(7):67-78.
[3] SIEGEL R,NAISHADHAM D,JEMAL A.Cancer statistics,2013[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2013,63(1):11-30.
[4] LAMB B W,GREEN J S,BENN J,et al.Improving decision making in multidisiciplinary tumor boards:prospective longitudinal evaluation of a multicomponent intervention for 1421 patients[J].J Am Coll Surg,2013,217(3):412-420.
[5] PRADES J,BORRAS J M.Shifting sands:adapting the multidisciplinary team model to technological and organizational innovations in cancer care[J].Future Oncol,2014,10(13):1995-1998.
[6] GAGA M,POWELL C,SCHRA UFNAGEL D,et al.An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement:the role of the pulmonologist in the diagnosis and management of lung cancer[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2013,188(4):503-507.
[7] LI H,WANG C,YU J,et al.Dendritic cell-activated cytokine-induced killer cells enhance the anti-tumor effect of chemotherapy on non-small cell lung cancer in patients after surgery[J].Cytotherapy,2009,11(8):1076-1083.
[8] UNG K A,CAMPBELL B A,DUPLAN D,et al.Impact of the lung oncology multidisciplinary team meetings on the management of patients with cancer[J].Asia Pac J Clin Oncol,2016,12(2):e298-e304.
[9] MCGREGOR D,RANKIN N,BUTOW P,et al.Closing evidence-practice gaps in lung cancer:Results from multi-methods priority setting in the clinical context[J].Asia Pac J Clin Oncol,2017,13(1):28-36.
[10] 陈克能.如何保持外科医师在胸部肿瘤多学科中的积极作用[J].临床外科杂志,2016,7(24):482-484.
[11] JALIL R,LAMB B,RUSS S,et al.The cancer multi-disciplinary team from the co-ordinators' perspective:results from a national survey in the UK[J].BMC Health Serv Res,2012,12(1):1-8.
[12] 邹晶,徐兴祥,王大新,等.肺癌多学科模式对患者平均住院日及平均住院费用的影响[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2015,5(38):370-373.
[13] KEHL K L,LANDRUM M B,KAHN K L,et al.Tumor board participation among physicians caring for patients with lung or colorectal cancer[J].J Oncol Pract,2015,11(3):e267-e278.
[14] 陈波,吴国荣,杨万勇,等.HE4、CYFRA21-1和TPS联合检测对非小细胞肺癌的早期诊断价值[J].实用医学杂志,2016,32(22):3721-3724.
[15] 杜军华,乔洪源,尹宜发.血清CEA、CA125及Cyfra21-1水平对中晚期非小细胞肺癌患者预后的影响[J].肿瘤防治研究,2016,43(2):137-140.
[16] 张文娟,马华玲,郑明军,等.原发性非小细胞肺癌组织中Cathepsin D、PCNA的表达及其临床意义[J].诊断病理学杂志,2015,22(11):709-712.
[17] 曹文荣,闫文修,王雪利.非小细胞肺癌组织中VEGF和Bax的表达及意义[J].重庆医学,2016(3):307-309.
[18] 聂俊,何文杰,江波.肺癌多学科综合诊疗模式的探讨[J].医学与哲学,2017,3B(38):79-81.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 410840 位访问者


copyright ©《东南大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481 83272483
电子邮件:
bjb@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058364