>
网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
超声弹性成像在甲状腺良恶性小结节诊断中的价值
作者:韦小葵  冼丽娅  韦艳华  刘菊玲  王婧 
单位:广西柳州市中医院 超声科, 广西 柳州 545001
关键词:超声弹性成像 甲状腺小结节 常规超声 
分类号:R581;R445.1
出版年·卷·期(页码):2015·34·第一期(55-58)
摘要:

目的:探讨超声弹性成像(UE)在甲状腺良恶性小结节诊断中的价值。方法:收集甲状腺小结节138个,以病理检查结果为标准,对比UE及常规超声检查对甲状腺小结节良恶性鉴别诊断效能。结果:经病理证实的138个甲状腺小结节(直径≤1 cm的)良性结节96个,恶性结节42个。UE、常规超声对甲状腺实性小结节良恶性诊断的敏感度、特异度、准确性分别为95.2%、86.5%、89.1%和78.6%、83.9%、79.0%。结论:UE主要通过检测甲状腺小结节的硬度来鉴别诊断良恶性,其敏感性、准确性明显高于常规的超声检查,但部分甲状腺良恶性结节硬度间仍存在一定的重叠现象,故还须结合常规超声检查进行综合性诊断,以增加诊断的准确性。

Objective: To investigate the diagnosis value in benign and malignant thyroid nodules by ultrasound elastography. Methods: 138 thyroid nodules were collected. The pathological examination results as a standard, the efficacy in differential diagnosising benign and malignant thyroid nodules by UE or conventional ultrasound were compared. Results: Among 138 thyroid nodules(diameter≤1 cm)which were confirmed by pathology, there were 96 benign nodules and 42 malignant nodules. The diagnosis sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of benign or malignant thyroid solid nodule by UE, conventional ultrasonography were 95.2%, 86.5%, 89.1% and 78.6%, 83.9%, 79%, respectively. Conclusion: UE is mainly through detecting thyroid nodules' hardness for differential diagnosising benign or malignant. Its sensitivity, accuracy are significantly higher than those of conventional ultrasonography, but there are some benign and malignant thyroid nodules hardness which is still overlaped, so it needs to combine with conventional ultrasonography for incomprehensive diagnosis, in order to increase diagnosis accuracy.

参考文献:

[1] 安秀艳,丛淑珍,钱隽,等.超声弹性成像与18F-FDG PET/CT 在诊断甲状腺结节中的比较研究[J].中国临床医学影像学杂志,2012,23(10):692-693.
[2] 尚旭,周琦,姜珏,等.常规超声及实时超声弹性成像在桥本氏甲状腺炎诊断中的价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2011,20(5):406-407.
[3] 丛淑珍,冯占武,甘科红,等.甲状腺良、恶性结节超声弹性成像特征分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2010,26(9):1682-1684
[4] 丹海俊,王燕,丹海永,等.实时超声弹性成像诊断甲状腺单发实性小结节[J].中国医学影像技术,2010,26(1):63-65.
[5] SEBAG F,VAILLANT-LOMBARD J,BERBIS J,et al.Shear wave elastography:a new ultrasound imaging mode for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules[J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2010,95(12):5281-5288.
[6] PARK C S,KIM S H,JUNG S L,et al.Observer variability in the sonographic evaluation of thyroid nodules[J].J Clin Ultrasound,2010,38(6):287-293.
[7] FERRARI F S,MEGLIOLA A,SCORZELLI A,et al.Ultrasound examination using contrast agent and elastosonography in the evaluation of single thyroidnodules:preliminary results[J].J Ultrasound,2008,11(2):47-54.
[8] PARK S H,KIM S J,KIM E K,et al.Interobserver agreement in assessing the sonographic and elastographic features of malignant thyroid nodules[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2009,193(6):W416-W423.
[9] VEYRIERES J B,ALBAREL F,LOMBARD J V,et al.A threshold value in Shear Wave elastography to rule out malignant thyroid nodules:a reality?[J].Eur J Radiol ,2012,81(12):3965-3972.
[10] EWELINA S P,KOSMA W,KOSMA W,et al.Comparison of diagnostic value of conventional ultrasonography and shear wave elastography in the prediction of thyroid lesions malignancy[J].PLoS One,2013,8(11):e81532.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 405805 位访问者


copyright ©《东南大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481 83272483
电子邮件:
bjb@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058364